Legal Opinion

Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1999No. 98-1446PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The BOE primarily argues that Company, despite having an equitable interest in the property, does not have standing to file a valuation complaint as an owner, contending that the owner must hold legal title to the property. Company responds that, first, it had sufficient ownership interest, an equitable interest, to have standing to file the complaint. Second, it maintains that the complaint satisfies the standing requirement because the complaint listed Company and Partnership as the owner of the property, each of which, at some point, owned the property.

We conclude that the holder of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Foods v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Society National Bank v. Wood County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Refreshment Service Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Multiplex, Inc. v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Akron Centre Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. HIN, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Toledo Public Schools Board of Education v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Diley Ridge Med. Ctr. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API