Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Multiplex, Inc. v. City of South Euclid

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1973No. 73-405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Bnowrr, J.

App. R. 12(A), providing that “all errors assigned and briefed shall be passed upon by the court in writing, stating the reasons for the court’s decision,” is not applicable to this case, since the cause is *169one of first instance brought under Section 3, Article IV of the OMo Constitution; nevertheless, the Court of Appeals could have immeasurably aided this court by providing its reasons for granting the writ.

Appellants contend that, since Multiplex did not comply with the literal provisions of the city’s ordinance in submitting its application for a building permit, the building commissioner…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Performing Arts School of Metropolitan Toledo, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Zeltig Land Development Corp. v. Bainbridge Township Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. NDHMD, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API