Legal Opinion

Society National Bank v. Wood County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1998No. 97-1058PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Society contends that it met all the requirements of R.C. 5715.13 and 5715.19, and therefore had standing to file a complaint for a decrease in the valuation of the real property. We disagree.

The two statutes of primary importance when considering the standing of a party to file a complaint for a decrease in valuation with a board of revision are R.C. 5715.19 and 5715.13.

R.C. 5715.19(A)(1) provides:

*403“Any person owning taxable real property in the county or in a taxing district with territory in the county * * * may file such a complaint regarding any such determination affecting any real…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Middleton v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Toledo Public Schools Board of Education v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Diley Ridge Med. Ctr. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API