Society National Bank v. Wood County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Society contends that it met all the requirements of R.C. 5715.13 and 5715.19, and therefore had standing to file a complaint for a decrease in the valuation of the real property. We disagree.
The two statutes of primary importance when considering the standing of a party to file a complaint for a decrease in valuation with a board of revision are R.C. 5715.19 and 5715.13.
R.C. 5715.19(A)(1) provides:
*403“Any person owning taxable real property in the county or in a taxing district with territory in the county * * * may file such a complaint regarding any such determination affecting any real…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Middleton v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by15 opinions
- Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Toledo Public Schools Board of Education v. Lucas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Diley Ridge Med. Ctr. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.