Legal Opinion
Refreshment Service Co. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1981No. 80-1371PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStrausbaugh, J.
Appellant appeals the decision of the Court of Appeals, claiming that because appellee had a beneficial interest in the improvements made to the convention center, appellee is liable for the personal property taxes assessed against the improvement. Any resolution of the issue *402raised by the facts of this case must be based on the definition of “taxpayer,” found at R. C. 5711.01(B) and partially set forth below:
“ ‘Taxpayer’ means any owner of taxable property and includes every person residing in, or incorporated or organized by or under the laws of this state, or doing business in this state,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Equilease Corp. v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Snodgrass v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Victoria Plaza Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Chicago v. Elm State Property LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Cleveland v. Capital Source BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2019