Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Bain

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

Plaintiff operates a moving picture theater in Portland. He brought this action, setting up in his complaint one method which he follows to increase the number of his patrons, and praying that a declaratory judgment be entered holding that he is •not thereby maintaining a lottery.

Based wholly upon these allegations, no answer having been filed, the trial court held that the method followed by the plaintiff constituted a lottery and, on defendants’ motion, granted judgment on the pleadings. From this judgment, the plaintiff has appealed.

The particular allegations of the complaint on which the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Maughs v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. Greater Huntington Theatre Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. CUDD v. AschenbrennerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Animal Protection Society of Durham, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API