Legal Opinion

Freund v. Utah Power & Light Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1990No. 880261PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, pursuant to rule 41 of the Rules of the Utah Supreme Court, has certified to us the following questions of Utah law: (1) whether the exclusive remedy provision of the Utah Workers’ Compensation Act, Utah Code Ann. § 35-1-60, bars a claim by a third party that a statutory employer impliedly agreed to indemnify the third party against claims for injuries sustained by an employee; (2) whether, under Utah law, the indemnification provision of paragraph 21 of the “Facilities Attachment Agreement” is a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Margolin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Diamond State Telephone Co. v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  5. Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pearce v. Utah Athletic FoundationUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Goodyear Tire v. J.M. Tull MetalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Utah Transit Authority v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Public Service Co. of Colorado v. United Cable Television of Jeffco, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API