Latzig v. Transamerica Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a summary judgment determining a partially disabled insured eligible for no-fault income loss benefits. Appellant insurer claims the trial court erred because (1) respondent, as a matter of law, cannot meet the definition of “inability to work” and (2) genuine issues of material fact exist regarding respondent’s reasonable qualifications for other work she could perform. We affirm.
FACTS
The following facts are not in dispute. On July 21, 1984, respondent Marla Latzig injured her right shoulder in a single vehicle accident. Appellant Transamerica…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Chacos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Prax v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Darby v. American Family Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Koller v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Erickson v. Great American Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991