Legal Opinion

Latzig v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 1987No. C9-87-652PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment determining a partially disabled insured eligible for no-fault income loss benefits. Appellant insurer claims the trial court erred because (1) respondent, as a matter of law, cannot meet the definition of “inability to work” and (2) genuine issues of material fact exist regarding respondent’s reasonable qualifications for other work she could perform. We affirm.

FACTS

The following facts are not in dispute. On July 21, 1984, respondent Marla Latzig injured her right shoulder in a single vehicle accident. Appellant Transamerica…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Chacos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Prax v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Darby v. American Family Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Koller v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erickson v. Great American Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API