Koller v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court determining that the respondent is entitled to receive income loss benefits under his no-fault policy until he has been retrained and becomes qualified for employment.
We affirm.
FACTS
On March 2, 1982 the respondent, Kyle Koller, was injured in an automobile collision, suffering permanent loss of motion in his left wrist and left foot. Koller had been employed as a truck driver prior to the accident.
Koller was insured under policies which provided for payment of disability and income loss benefits, reduced “by income…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Chacos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Bregier v. National Family Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Guenther v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Latzig v. Transamerica Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987