Legal Opinion

Prax v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1982No. 81-1098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

This appeal arises out of an action brought by respondent Arnold Prax against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) to recover income loss benefits under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. Cross-motions for summary judgment were heard in the Washington County District Court, and on August 18, 1981, the trial court entered summary judgment for Prax, holding State Farm liable for income loss benefits which had been withheld since September of 1980. We affirm.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. On October 6, 1979 Arnold Prax was injured while in the course of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Record v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Peterson v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chacos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Erickson v. Great American Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Darby v. American Family Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Latzig v. Transamerica Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Darby v. American Family Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API