Legal Opinion

Williams v. . Gooch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CueiaM.

Three separate, distinct and disconnected causes of action are alleged in tbe complaint. It does not appear from tbe complaint that the corporate plaintiff bas any interest in either of these causes of action. Only tbe individual plaintiff would be entitled to recover on either of the causes of action alleged in the complaint.

On the first cause of action which is for the breach of a contract between the individual plaintiff and two of the defendants, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover of these defendants only. Neither of the other defendants is liable to the plaintiff on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. Southern Transit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Town of Wllkesboro v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Holland v. . WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. BANNISTER & SONS, INC. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. McEachern v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API