Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1957No. 383PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RodmáN, J.

The complaint does not contain that plain and concise statement of fact contemplated by the statute, G.S. 1-122(2).

The complaint is not divided into causes of action. By rearrangement it states facts set out below as the basis for the relief sought.

First cause of action.(1) Plaintiffs are grandchildren of Bennie K. Davis, who died testate 3 January 1950. Sallie Davis Burton and John Boyd Davis are named as executors of her will. (The will is not attached to nor made part of the complaint. Neither the date of probate nor qualification of executors is shown.)(2) Bennie K. Davis owned…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Fisher v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lichtenfels v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Davis v. SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Kearns v. PrimmSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Mitchell v. DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API