Marion Terwilliger and Doris Terwilliger v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, and James Shelby, Jointly and Severally, M.J. Jorgensen
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Chief Judge.
Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound”) appeals the judgment of the district court awarding plaintiff Marion Ter-williger damages following a jury determination that Greyhound committed fraud and misrepresentation under Michigan law against Terwilliger by denying Terwilli-ger’s application for reemployment in 1971. For the reasons stated below, we find that Terwilliger’s state-law claim is preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and hold that this case should have been dismissed for Terwilliger’s failure to exhaust the remedies…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hayes Jones v. General Motors Corporation and United Auto Workers, Local 1112Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- DeCoe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Michael Emswiler v. CSX Transportation Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.