Legal Opinion
Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 20, 1990No. Nos. 89-3564, 89-3565 and 89-3566PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH- B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
In this wrongful discharge action, plaintiff Minnie Fox appeals from the entry of summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds as to both her hybrid section 3011 claim and her state law claim for tortious interference with contractual relations, which the district court treated as preempted by section 301. In addition, defendant International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 54 (the Union), challenges the district court’s determination that section 301 does not preempt various other state law claims asserted by plaintiffs Minnie…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Hayes Jones v. General Motors Corporation and United Auto Workers, Local 1112Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Richard Baker, Cross-Appellee v. Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. And Lawson WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- DeCoe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc. v. Walcher & Fox, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Paul v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.