Legal Opinion
Philbin v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 2017No. 105356PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J.:
{¶ 1} Appellants, Andrew P. Philbin and Luis S. Sandoval ("appellants"), appeal the dismissal of their administrative appeal. Their sole assignment of error states:
The trial court erred by dismissing this administrative appeal for lack of standing.
{¶ 2} We find no merit to the appeal and affirm.
I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 3} Appellants own a home in the historic Ohio City neighborhood of Cleveland, Ohio. In 2015, Triban Investment, L.L.C. ("Triban") applied for zoning variances to construct a six-unit, four-story condominium building on property located at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Willoughby Hills v. C. C. Bar's Sahara, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Safest Neighborhood Assn. v. Athens Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hicks v. Union Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Meziane v. Munson Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020