Legal Opinion
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 2006No. 2005-1438PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} We accepted this discretionary appeal to determine whether a board of county commissioners has standing to challenge a law permitting the transfer of federal welfare grant money to the state’s General Revenue Fund and, if so, whether the law was valid.
{¶ 2} In 1996, Congress revamped the federal welfare program with enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. Pub.L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105. Aid to Families with Dependent Children was replaced with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (“TANF”), which provided block grants to participating…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ohio Contractors Ass'n v. BickingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilmington Cty. Sch. Dbe v. Bcc Clinton Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Kincaid v. Erie InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Cordray v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Merrill v. Ohio Department of Natural ResourcesOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2012
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.