Legal Opinion

People v. Muhammad

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2007No. A110774PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

Penal Code section 646.9 1 sets out in several subdivisions the definition of stalking as well as alternate penalties for the offense that depend upon the stalker’s criminal history. Thus, in subdivision (a) stalking is defined and an alternate misdemeanor or felony punishment of up to three years in prison is prescribed. A felony sentence of up to four years under subdivision (b) of section 646.9 or five years under subdivision (c) of section 646.9 is imposed if subdivision (a) is violated at a time when a valid restraining order protecting the victim from the accused is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. SumstineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. Jonathan R.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. CoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. State v. WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Dietrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API