Legal Opinion

Dietrick v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 2013No. C073008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUARTE, J.

This case involves “ ‘a particularly unpardonable fault of the prosecutor—unpreparedness.’ ” (People v. Whitaker (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 999, 1006 [153 Cal.Rptr.3d 165].)

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On March 16, 2012, the People filed their first felony complaint charging petitioner Erick Lloyd Dietrick with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (Count One), and DUI with a blood-alcohol level above 0.08 percent (Count Two), and as to each count alleged he had been convicted of a felony DUI within the past 10 years. (See Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subds. (a) & (b), 23550.5.) Absent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Burris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (HC) Freeman v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (HC) Freeman v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. People v. Freeman CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API