Legal Opinion

In Re Adoption of Howard Clay Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1923No. 13338, 13392PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John L. Norman, Judge. Petitions by Olivia Wolford to set aside adoption proceedings and for writ of ¡habeas corpus seeking the care and custody of minor child, Howard Clay Hughes, Jr., judgments for petitioner, and adverse parties, Lillian and Paul Kennedy, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

The first of the above entitled and numbered cases is lan appeal from tine action of the county court of Tulsa county in setting aside the adoption proceedings of Howard Clay Hughes, Jr., a minor child, had in that court. In that proceeding, Olivia Wolford, the mother of the child, was the petitioner.

The second case was also instituted by Olivia Wolford, she being petitioner, for a vtrit of habeas corpus, wherein she alleged that the child, Howard Clay Hughes, Jr., was being unlawfully and illegally withheld from her care- and custody by Lillian and Paul Kennedy. Upon return to the writ of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re the Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re BushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. In Re Talley's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Barnes v. PaanakkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. In Re TindellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. McPherson v. RakeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API