State Ex Rel. McPherson v. Rakey
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.
After the appeal was taken plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss it on the ground that in this form of proceeding no right of appeal to this court is granted by any statute or rule of this court.' We held that plaintiff was not entitled to have its motion considered because it was not served within the time required by Rule 348(a), Rules of Civil Procedure. See State ex rel. McPherson v. Rakey, 236 Iowa 332, 18 N. W. 2d 529.
In brief and argument plaintiff renews its contention that no appeal lies in this form of action. Since this is a question that goes to our jurisdiction to entertain the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wissenburg v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- In Re Adoption of AlleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- In Re Adoption of Howard Clay HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Porter v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Studabaker v. MarkleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buda v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Bales v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Hubbard v. MarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Crowe v. De Soto Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.