Legal Opinion

In Re Talley's Estate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1941No. 29753PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the year 1926 James R. Burgess, hereinafter called petitioner, was a boy of 14. By the written consent of himself and his only live parent, and by proper procedure of the county court in accordance with sections 1701 to 1716, O. S. 1931, 10 Okla. St. Ann. §§ 41 to 56, he was adopted by Thomas F. Talley and Cynthia Talley, husband and wife.

Five years later the natural parent filed a petition for adoption in the same county court, praying that petitioner be his adopted child and "be restored to him as the relation stood prior to said former adoption" and that he be given his original name of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dreyer v. SchrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Villier v. Watson's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Patterson v. BrowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Klapp v. PulsipherMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Holmes v. CurlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. In Re Estate of LeichtenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Matter of Estate of FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Hooper v. ClinkingbeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Coonradt v. SailorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API