United States v. Eller
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Ferguson, Judge:
In this case, as in United States v Rivera, 20 USCMA 6, 42 CMR 198 (1970), and United States v Boatner, 20 USCMA 376, 43 CMR 216 (1971), the staff judge advocate erred by failing to inform the convening authority, in the post-trial review, that Eller’s immediate commanding officer had recommended, prior to trial, that Eller not be eliminated from the service. Regarding the nature of the error, we said in Boatner:
“It is at the level of the convening authority that an accused has his best opportunity for relief because of the former’s broad powers which are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. FieldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. GreenwaltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. BoatnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. KellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. WartsbaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. DixsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. MassingillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. RingorU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.