Legal Opinion
United States v. Bogle
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 25, 1988No. 87-856-CR-MARCUS, 87-858-CR-KEHOE, 88-14001-CR-DAVIS, 88-8019-CR-DAVIS, 87-855-CR-ARONOVITZ, 88-006-CR-RYSKAMP, 87-848-CR-KEHOE and 87-964-CR-HASTINGSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, District Judge.
At issue today is a constitutional challenge to the validity of the Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission (“Commission”) pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 as amended (“Act”). Pub.L. No. 98-473, Title Ii; 98 Stat. 1976, 2017 (1984), amended by Sentencing Act of 1987, Pub.L. No. 100-182, 101 Stat. 1266 (1987). We are called upon to decide the validity of an Act of Congress, one of the “gravest and most delicate” tasks that a Court will ever face. See Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57, 65, 101 S.Ct. 2646,…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Nestor Julio Perez-Garcia, Sebastian Viera, Jorge Felix Rodriguez, Pedro Luis RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. SantanaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Lazaro SerraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.