Legal Opinion

Goodman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 25, 1998No. 97-4123PublishedCited by 63 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Gary Goodman appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his motion challenging the validity of his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We agree with both parties that the district court erred in dismissing Goodman’s motion, filed sixteen days after the effective date of § 105 of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), which established a one-year judge “period of limitation” for § 2255 motions, on timeliness grounds.

In August of 1988, Goodman pled guilty to stealing $5,600 from a federally insured bank and was sentenced to twelve years in prison…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Calderon v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Richard Joseph Lynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Sandvik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. James Marcello and Anthony ZizzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Anthony Aron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API