Legal Opinion

United States v. Santana

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 20, 2011No. 7:09-cr-01022PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

Defendants William Anderson, Fred Cannon, James McCrae, and Pierre Myke, joined by co-defendants, move for an order from this Court declaring that the provisions of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA” or “Act”) are applicable to their sentences in this case. 1 (Dkt. Nos. 257, 268, 282, 296.) For the reasons stated herein, the motions are DENIED.

I. Background

A. Facts

The forty-one Defendants in this case are charged in a three-count indictment, Count One of which alleges conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New York v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. United States v. SidneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Kurt CarpentinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. United States v. WattsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. United States v. CaparottaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API