Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Doherty

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1949No. 5150PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by appellees to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale and purchase of real estate. The defense was that the title offered was not marketable.

The trial court made findings of fact in substance as follows:

On the 22nd day of August 1947 the plaintiffs Campbell and Campbell .were seized of the property in suit. On the same day they entered into a contract of sale and purchase with defendants wherein defendants agreed to pay therefor $5581.31. There was at the time a mortgage against this property in favor of the Tucumcari Federal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dunham v. StitzbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. McDonald v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re Field's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mundo v. FústerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  2. Hales v. Van CleaveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Burton v. CastilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Chavez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kaye v. Cooper Grocery CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API