Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Padilla

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1948No. 5055PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This is a statutory action, brought by plaintiff (appellee here) to quiet title to 205.26 acres of land, a part of the town of Atrisco Grant. The plaintiff claims under a tax deed from the state, and the defendants, each claiming some part of the land in suit, allege that the tax title under which appellee claims is void and sues by cross action to quiet the title to the land claimed by him in himself. If plaintiff’s tax deed is valid, as held by the trial court, then the cause should be affirmed, otherwise it should be reversed and rendered for defendants.

The question then…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Torres v. Village of CapitanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bounds v. CarnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Adams & McGahey v. NeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Kalosha v. NovickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hambaugh v. PeoplesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API