Moody v. Addison Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
D.P. Marshall Jr., Judge.
This workers’ compensation case asks whether substantial evidence supports the Commission’s denial of benefits to Laveam Moody for her gradual-onset shoulder injury. It does not. We therefore reverse and remand for the Commission to consider Moody’s claim further.
I
Lavearn Moody worked at Addison Shoe Company for thirty years. She spent her entire career working as a heel padder. The Commission found her to be a credible witness. Moody explained that she started each morning at work by bringing a bucket of glue and a bucket of cleaning fluid to her workstation. She…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malone v. Texarkana Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pulaski County Special School District v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- International Paper Company v. Ronald L. StewardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
- Carlat v. Ark. Highway & Transp. Dep'tCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018