Legal Opinion

Moody v. Addison Shoe Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 2008No. CA 08-452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D.P. Marshall Jr., Judge.

This workers’ compensation case asks whether substantial evidence supports the Commission’s denial of benefits to Laveam Moody for her gradual-onset shoulder injury. It does not. We therefore reverse and remand for the Commission to consider Moody’s claim further.

I

Lavearn Moody worked at Addison Shoe Company for thirty years. She spent her entire career working as a heel padder. The Commission found her to be a credible witness. Moody explained that she started each morning at work by bringing a bucket of glue and a bucket of cleaning fluid to her workstation. She…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malone v. Texarkana Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pulaski County Special School District v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  2. International Paper Company v. Ronald L. StewardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  3. Carlat v. Ark. Highway & Transp. Dep'tCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API