Legal Opinion

Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1999No. CA 98-678PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John E. Jennings, Judge.

Renate Hapney filed a workers’ compensation claim, contending that she had sustained a ruptured cervical disc while working at Rheem Manufacturing on February 2, 1996. She proceeded under three alternative theories of compensability, arguing that her injury was: (1) caused by a specific incident and identifiable by time and place of occurrence under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(5)(A)(i) (Supp. 1997); (2) caused by rapid repetitive motion under § ll-9-102(5)(A)(ii)(a) (Supp. 1997); and (3) a back injury not caused by a specific incident (i.e., gradual onset) under §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lawhon Farm Services v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Malone v. Texarkana Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Moody v. Addison Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Taylor v. LubritechCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Frances v. Gaylord Container Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API