Legal Opinion
Burciaga v. West
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided April 1, 1998No. 7:97-cv-00188PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRIONES, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on January 15, 1998, in the above-captioned cause. Plaintiff filed a Response on February 2, 1998. Defendant then filed a reply letter to Plaintiff’s Response on February 4, 1998. In turn, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant’s reply letter on February 17, 1998. 1 After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted for the reasons that follow.
FACTS
Plaintiff is a Hispanic male who is and was at least the age of 40 at all times…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pinkerton v. SpellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Pinkerton v. SpellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Handy v. BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Pinkerton v. U.S. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Richey v. City of LilburnDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.