Legal Opinion

Pinkerton v. Spellings

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2007No. 06-10657PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

In response to the Secretary of Education’s Petition for Rehearing, we withdraw the prior panel opinion, 518 F.3d 278, in its entirety and substitute the following:

Robert Pinkerton, after his termination as an employee of the United States Department of Education (“DOE”), brought this suit alleging disability discrimination under Sections 501 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 and 794. The precedent of this circuit allowed his suit under both sections of the Act and Pinkerton was entitled to the proper Section 501 causation standard. Because the jury charge stated the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Rachid v. Jack In The Box IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Taylor, Carolyn v. Small, Lawrence M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Joanne Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care System and Forum HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LHC Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. Pinkerton v. SpellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Lopez v. KempthorneDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Franklin v. City of SlidellDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
  5. Von Drasek v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API