Legal Opinion

Jones v. McQuesten

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1933No. 24232. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

By this action, the plaintiff sought a money judgment for damages. In the complaint, there were three causes of action, separately stated. The first arose out of alleged fraud in a real estate transaction; the second, for failure to deliver personal property, as contracted; and the third, for the breach of a lease. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon the first cause of action in the sum of $8,000, upon the second $250, and upon the third $2,725.

The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Oldfield v. Angeles Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Levine v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Brown v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Campanelli v. VesceraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
  4. Marion v. Grand Coulee Dam HotelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Rowland v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API