Legal Opinion

Bio-Line, Inc. v. Wilfley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1985No. C9-84-1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellants seek review of a July 27, 1984 order which required them to post additional security (for a total of $44,674.89) to obtain requested injunctive relief and of a September 12, 1984 order which vacated the injunction for failure to post the security as required. Respondents then sought replevin to enforce their promissory notes. By findings of fact, conclusions of law and order for judgment dated October 9, 1984, the trial court required appellants to make monthly payments to respondents “on the notes until final resolution of” the underlying lawsuit in lieu of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Petition of GiblinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Bio-Line Inc. v. WilfleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Fletcher v. SellnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howe v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Carlson v. MixellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API