Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Mixell

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 29, 1987No. C3-87-145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Vendees under a contract for deed appeal the amount of an injunction bond set by the trial court in the contract termination proceedings. We remand for reconsideration.

FACTS

In April 1985 Grant and Ruth Carlson entered into a contract for deed with Opal, Robert and Sandra Mixell for the purchase of a house at 245 Irving Avenue North in Minneapolis. The original terms were a purchase price of $46,500 paid by monthly installments of $400, a downpayment of $10,000 and a final balloon payment after seven years. By agreement of the parties, the terms were changed to divide the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Smith v. SpitzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Bio-Line, Inc. v. WilfleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Seger v. DeGardnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eide v. BierbaumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API