Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Ferraina
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 17, 2007No. AC 26015PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
In this entry and detainer action, the defendants, Daniel J. Ferraina and Thomas DeFranzo, brought this appeal challenging the trial court’s judgment in favor of one of the plaintiffs,1 David R. Wilcox. The defendants argue that the court improperly found that Wilcox was in actual possession of the property at issue within the meaning of the entry and detainer statute, General Statutes § 47a-43.2 In addition, the defendants dispute the court’s finding that they dispossessed Wilcox “with force and strong hand” in violation of § 47a-43. We disagree with both of the defendants’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Hartford Realization Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Orentlicherman v. MatareseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Bowman v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Curley v. KaiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- City of Bridgeport v. Grace Bldg., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Iacurci v. WellsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Blow v. KonetchyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.