Legal Opinion

Murray v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. It was brought against William F. Nelson and Joseph Segale, but was discontinued against the latter as will hereinafter appear. It was tried below by jury, and verdict was for the. plaintiff. The defendant brings it here on exceptions.

The defendant owns a wooden building fronting on Merchants ’ Row, the principal business street in the city of Rutland. There are two stores on the ground floor, divided at the front by a hallway opening directly on the street and containing stairs leading to the second floor. In the northerly store…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Tremblay v. . Harmony MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  3. Brown v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Belka v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  5. Hynes v. BrewerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. State v. OrlandiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. State v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API