Legal Opinion

Central Management Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 24, 1989No. 1 CA-IC 88-153PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Chief Judge.

This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award for a compen-sable claim. We must decide whether the administrative law judge erred by finding that the respondent employee (claimant) was an employee of the petitioner employer, Central Management Company (CMC) and not of respondent employer, Florenda Smith (Smith). CMC seeks review, asserting that Smith was either the sole or dual employer of the claimant. Because we find the administrative law judge’s award reasonably supported by the evidence, we affirm.

The claimant was injured on September 6, 1987, while…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Morgan Cab Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Coviello v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Anton v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. State Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Nelson v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API