Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1990No. CV-89-0042-PRPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SARAH D. GRANT, Chief Judge,
Court of Appeals.
The appellant, William Santiago (Santiago), asks this court to review the court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. (PNI). We granted review to consider whether the trial court correctly found as a matter of law that PNI was not vicariously liable for the injuries Santiago sustained in a collision with a PNI delivery agent. See Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
O…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Tribe v. Shell Oil Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Ochoa v. J.B. Martin & Sons Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Aaron Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering IncArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Dague v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- State Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.