Legal Opinion

State v. Ballard

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2016No. 20140333PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeremy Ballard appeals a district court judgment after he conditionally pled guilty to drug charges, reserving the right to challenge the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He argues the district court should have suppressed evidence from his residence because the suspicion-less probationary search violated his constitutional rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. We reverse because the suspicionless search of an unsupervised probationer’s home was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

I

[¶ 2] In October 2013…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline v. TanderupNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. WallaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. StenhoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API