State v. Wallace
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Jensen, Justice.
[¶ 1] William Wallace appeals from a second amended criminal judgment entered after he pleaded guilty to luring minors by computer or other electronic means. We conclude the district court did not substantially comply with N.D.R.Crim.P. 11 when the court failed to inform Wallace of and determine that he understood the five-year mandatory minimum period of probation. We reverse and remand to the district court to allow Wallace to withdraw his plea of guilty and for further necessary proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] In September 2016, the State charged Wallace with luring minors by computer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BlurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HoehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Byrd v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. JamesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. JamesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020