Legal Opinion

State v. White

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2017No. 20160227PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jesse White appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found he was guilty of possession of certain materials prohibited. We affirm, concluding the probation search of White’s cell phones did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights and sufficient evidence supports his conviction.

I

[¶ 2] White was on supervised probation when his residence was searched. His probation conditions required him to submit to a search of his person, vehicle or residence as requested by his probation officer.

[¶ 3] On April 15, 2014, a probation officer searched White’s residence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of West Fargo v. MedberyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. PowleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. LietzauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. State v. BurowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. ChristieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API