Legal Opinion

St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Arms

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRainex, C. J.

On August 21, 1909, ap-pellee, J. A. Arms, was in the employ of the appellant at work at night at Francis, Okl., in the capacity of hostler. It was a part of his duty as hostler to assist in making engines ready for the road, which included the recleaning of ash pans of incoming engines at a pit provided for that purpose. Prior to May, 1909, a practice had grown up among the employés at Francis to draw the slide of the ash pans by means of a chain fastened to the track; the slide being drawn by hitching the chain to the pan and starting the engine. No chain was provided by the defendant for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Buie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. HinzieTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. KiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Kreps v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CasselberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API