International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Hinzie
Texas Supreme Court
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
TARLTON, Judge,
Section B.—This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment for $9000, rendered May 2, 1890, by the District Court of Anderson County, in favor of INoel Chapman, a minor, suing by his guardian Martin Hinzie, and against appellant, the International & Great ¡¡Northern Bail way Company. The suit is for damages for personal injuries sustained by Chapman while in the employment of the railway company. The injuries are alleged to be due to the negligence of the company.
On ¡¡November 13, 1888, ¡¡Noel Chapman, a youth about 16 years old, was engaged as a painter in the car department of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Gulf v. Montier.Texas Supreme Court · 1884
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. BrazzilTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Bonner v. WingateTexas Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Koerner v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Fedor v. Mauwehu Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1958
- Jackson ex rel. Jackson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- City of San Antonio v. BodemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.