Legal Opinion

Burns Holding Corp. v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 26, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The application is for a mandamus to require the state highway commission to institute and complete a proceeding under the Eminent Domain act of 1900 (Comp. Stat., p. 3183), to assess and pay to relator the damage alleged to have been sustained by it on account of the building of part of a new state highway between Rahway and Metuchen, between the tracks of the Pennsylvania railroad and the state reform school. The Perth Amboy branch of that railroad crosses the tract of which relator’s property is a part, from northwest to southeast.

No land of relator has been or is to be taken. The claim…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. R. & A. Realty Corp. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  2. Grigg Hanna Lumber & Box Co. v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. KuglerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Hulett v. Borough of Sea GirtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  5. S. B. Penick & Co. v. New York Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API