Legal Opinion
Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 1, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
111 N.J. Super. 50 (1970)
267 A.2d 64
JERSEY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 6, 1970.
Decided July 1, 1970.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.
Mr. Benjamin H. Chodash argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Krieger, Chodash & Politan, attorneys).
Mr. George R. Handler argued the cause for respondent Goldhand, Ltd. (Messrs. George R. and William…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. New River Collieries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission v. ColburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Booth v. Township of WinslowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Housing Auth. of Hoboken, Nj v. SegalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Freeman v. Paterson Redevelop. AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- State v. William G. Rohrer, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979