Legal Opinion

S. B. Penick & Co. v. New York Cent. R.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 3, 1940No. 7225PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The appellants own certain improved real estate abutting on Willow Avenue, a public highway in Hoboken, New Jersey. Willow Avenue, prior to the happening of the events set forth in the complaint, was crossed at grade by the appellee railroad companies’ tracks. These companies, pursuant to an order of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey, cpn-structed a viaduct and carried Willow Avenue above and across the tracks. Part of the viaduct is located on Willow Avenue at a point where the appellants’ properties abut upon it. The appellants by their complaint…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sauer v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Sauer v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Strobel Steel Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Faulks v. Borough of AllenhurstSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. R. & A. Realty Corp. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Thompson v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Thompson v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API