Legal Opinion
Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 11, 2001No. 9405-03390; A91012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
This case concerns whether a manufacturer of fishbowls is liable to a consumer because of the failure of the manufacturer to warn that its fishbowls are subject to shattering after they acquire small cracks or dings during ordinary use. Plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries that she suffered when a fishbowl that defendant manufactured shattered while she was carrying it. We originally reversed the judgment in favor of plaintiff and remanded the case for a new trial. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc., 149 Or App 464, 944 P2d 957 (1997). On review, the Supreme Court reversed our…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.