Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Tarkington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1936No. 26448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Edith Tarkington, brought this suit to recover from the city of Oklahoma City, the defendant, damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband.

The plaintiff charged in her amended petition that the city constructed and maintained a dam across the North Canadian river to empound waters; that the plaintiff and her husband resided near the river below said dam; that on account of heavy rainfall the channel of the river was .filled to capacity by the storm waters, and during the time that the river was running to full capacity, the defendant opened flood gates releasing large…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Reichert v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McKoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Parrish v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Naxera v. WathanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Bailey v. SissonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. City of Enid v. ReeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Charvoz v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Nichols Transfer & Storage Co. v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API