Legal Opinion

Jones v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1903PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Before Izlar., special Judge, Kershaw, December, 1903. Action by Wiley L. Jones, Oliver P. Jones and Jno. J. Jones against Seaboard Air Line Railway.

Read the full summary

Before Izlar., special Judge, Kershaw, December, 1903. Action by Wiley L. Jones, Oliver P. Jones and Jno. J. Jones against Seaboard Air Line Railway. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals on the foilwing exceptions: “1. Because upon the motion for a nonsuit his Honor, the presiding Judge, should have taken judicial cognizance of the fact that the Wateree River is a navigable stream, so declared- by the act of 1753, and should have held that the obstruction, if unlawful, would constitute a public nuisance, and that no action could be maintained by the plaintiffs, whose injuries, as…

1Opinion of the Court

July 21, 1903. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The South Bound Railroad Company in building its road from Camden to Columbia constructed a temporary bridge across the Wateree River at Camden, and subsequently replaced it with a permanent bridge resting on stone piers. The plaintiffs made a deed to the railroad company for a right of way over their lands to the river. In 1901, the South Bound Railroad Company was merged into the Seaboard Air Line Railway by consolidation. This action is brought against the Seaboard Air Line Railway for damages and injunction. The grounds of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Rumsey v. New York & New England R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. City of Janesville v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ellis v. Portsmouth & Roanoke Rail RoadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Clark v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Moore v. Associated Material & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Fordham v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API