Legal Opinion

Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 26, 2010No. Civil Action 00-1709-JDSPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JACK D. SHANSTROM, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Adam Ciralsky, brought this action against Defendants, various individuals and Plaintiffs former employer, the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”, or the “Agency”), for the following causes of action: (1) discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act; (2) breach of employment contract; (3) improper disclosure and improper stewardship of federal agency records under the Privacy Act and (4) constitutional torts via a Bivens action. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. U.S. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Cockrum v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Feldman v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Hollabaugh v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API