Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 12, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1262 (RBW)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
On July 8, 2009, the plaintiff, Debra Clark Gordon, commenced this action against her employer, the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, alleging discriminatory and retaliatory employment practices in violation of 2 U.S.C. § 1311(a)(1) and 2 U.S.C. § 1317(a) of the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA”). Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. Currently before this Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mot.”), arguing that the “[pjlaintiff has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Schmidt v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Moran v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Fortune v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.